The governors political advisors had been warning him for weeks that it was imperative for Democrat Cathy Belter to win the Fairfax County seat vacated by Sen. Warren Barry, a once-in-a-blue-moon Republican whom Warner appointed to the Alcoholic Beverage Control Board.
But that didnt happen. Belter, a Fairfax County school board member, lost. In fact, she got walloped. And state Democrats who just knew this one was in the bag for them Belter was better funded and had more big guns supporting her are now embarrassed.
The victor was Republican Ken Cuccinelli, a 34-year-old patent lawyer making his first bid for public office. He got 55 percent of the vote in what both campaigns said was a surprisingly high turnout (16 percent) for an August special election.
Obviously, the reason the governors advisors saw it as a high-stakes race was because its outcome inevitably would be seen as a barometer of support for the regional half-penny sales tax increase on the November ballot. Warner is championing the tax increase and many believe the referendum stands to define his administration for the history books.
The tax increase is for transportation projects in the traffic-clogged region. Its projected to generate some $5 billion over the next 20 years.
Both candidates readily admit that the tax increase was the defining issue in the intense four-week campaign. Cuccinelli, a social and fiscal conservative supported by the like-minded, adamantly opposed the tax hike; Belter, backed heavily by public school advocates and tax-increase supporters, strongly favored it.
But it is certainly less than clear whether the outcome of this race is a true predictor of what voters will do on the tax referendum three months from now. A special election is a much different animal than a general election, and voting for people based on their views on many issues is a lot different than voting yes or no on a single issue.
What is clear is that opponents of the tax referendum have gained momentum. They have every right to spin the outcome of this race their way.
What also is clear is that Warner is losing a bit of his groove. With the full weight of his office behind the Belter campaign running in his own political backyard, no less he was beaten handily by a candidate Democrats snidely labeled ultra-conservative and out of the mainstream of Northern Virginia politics.
The Democrats tired old refrain of calling Republicans extremists is running thin. (Warner himself has been careful not to sing this song, at least not too loudly.) Yes, Cuccinelli is against tax increases, is pro-life, and supports Second Amendment rights and home-schoolers. So what.
These are positions generally taken by the majority of all Republicans in the House of Delegates and Senate bodies both controlled by the GOP so plain math says most Virginians arent all that offended by them.
Northern Virginia Democrats not to mention the regions muscular business community who pumped mega-bucks into Belters campaign made light of Cuccinelli and his platform. In fact, many openly ridiculed him.
And then on Election Day, the kid kicked sand in their face. Kind of makes you chuckle, doesnt it?
Perhaps this is what Al Gore meant by the people versus the powerful.
Its been hard to find this past week a politician or pundit who doesnt think Warner took it on the chin when the anti-tax-increase Cuccinelli won that special election. And itll be increasingly hard between now and Novembers referendum to find anyone who wont agree that Warners stock is on the line.
Its too early to tell how Northern Virginians will vote on the tax hike. If the economy remains sluggish and peoples wealth continues to fall, then they may not be too keen on giving up even more of their money and contributing to their own hemorrhaging.
But the referendum will be the next chance for Warner to begin getting his groove back. If he doesnt, hell have little political capital stature to get anything else done.
Your thoughts?
The Bryant Archive
A media double standard?
Warner's California Ways
Bill Howell: the Un-Wesson