 |
|
Preston Bryant is a Republican who has represented Lynchburg and part of Amherst County in the Virginia House of Delgates since 1996.
|
Befuddlement envelops more than a few conservatives when liberty bumps up against security, not to mention privacy.
You see, conservatives, by nature, live to take on Big Government, the era of which can never, ever be thought of as over. There is the never-ending fight against “the state,” which will always be so much, too much with us. Lived for is the day when we finally know we’re being governed least, thus best.
Well, that’s what we say. But do we mean it?
All too often, our actions overshadow our words, and we conservatives then get wrapped around our philosophical axle. And, oh, how dizzy it makes us.
This is especially true for law-and-order conservatives. We all agree that the government’s top priority is public safety. We revere those who protect us from our enemies, both foreign and domestic, and we fall all over ourselves to support them – as we should. But we tend to not recognize when in the name of security we whittle away at liberty.
When our good Attorney General John Ashcroft was a U.S. Senator from Missouri, he could always be counted on to call as a spade proposed legislation – whether Democratic or Republican in origin – that encroached on our rights and freedoms, whether speech, assembly, gun ownership, or whatever.
In the wake of the September 11, 2001, attacks on our country, however, it was Ashcroft himself who authored investigation and surveillance proposals that a few years ago would have been anathema to him. Springing to mind is the sweeping Patriot Act, which allows the federal government to investigate Hoover-style everything from our library reading habits and neighborly associations to the reasons we take flying and scuba lessons.
But it’s not just at the federal level where conservatives seem to blur the lines between security and freedom. It happens in Virginia at the state and local levels, too.
Take, for example, the recurring General Assembly proposals over the past few years to employ surveillance cameras on our citizenry. Generally, the notion goes, we want to capitalize on technology for law-enforcement purposes. That’s noble, but to what extent should it trump conservatives’ broader philosophical goal of minimizing Big Brother’s intrusiveness?
Each year, there is legislation – coming mostly from Northern Virginia lawmakers – to authorize local police departments to set up cameras at intersections to nab red light runners. Here, the technology will snap a picture of your rear license plate as you speed through the light you certainly believed to have been yellow. Soon thereafter, you get a ticket in the mail. And in a new take on American justice, it’ll then be up to you to somehow overcome your presumed guilt and prove your innocence.
If you leave Northern Virginia and go to Virginia Beach, you’ll learn about that city’s move to install on its waterfront high-tech scanning cameras loaded with “facial recognition” software. This is where Big Brother takes an image of your face and matches it against thousands of wanted misdemeanants’ and felons’ pictures in a computer database someplace. Who knows what else somebody, somewhere might be watching you do.
A lot of this came to mind when it was reported over this Independence Day weekend you know, when we celebrated our declared break more than two centuries ago from an overbearing government that the city of Lynchburg will begin installing surveillance cameras at various recycling stations to nab those heinous citizens who get this throw trash in with the reusable paper, plastic, and aluminum. Presumably, the relatively conservative city council has signed off on this.
Granted, whether you’re driving through an intersection on a public street or walking down the beachfront boardwalk or going to the open-air recycling center, there’s no legitimate expectation of privacy to be had. But just how big and intrusive are conservatives in a largely conservative state going to let Brother get?
All of this goes much beyond Polaroid law enforcement. We conservatives get tangled up in our philosophy on matters extending well beyond the snap of a camera.
The Supreme Court has said a thing or two lately about privacy – namely, that it’s important, but also that it should be respected.
Conservatives – at the federal, state, and local levels of government – should remember that.
Let any elected or appointed official know what you think and how you feel by clicking here.
Post a message to Preston Bryant's message board
The Bryant Archive
Money, politics and higher education
McQuigg's roadmap
GOP primaries and tax reform
Cleaning up Capitol Square
Utopian Democrats
Looking beyond the higher ed summit
Virginia FREE's stubbed toe
Ireland and Virginia
Primary chances
ODU steps up to the plate
Days late and dollars short
The good and bad of higher ed rankings
Tax reform, Act IV
Jerry Kilgore: a man for our times
Carter and Scott: a dastardly duo
Warner's election year gamble
A rolling stop at VDOT?
Too small a step for higher ed
Budget onion II
The Conservative House
Republicans remake Warner budget
Judging judges
MLK at 74
Budget onion
Call to post
New Year with no new taxes
Republican General Assembly should support black heritage, MLK programs
Trent Lott must resign as majority leader
Public health: our bounden duty
Towards a free market in higher education
Tax reform is overdue
Hear them roar
Referendum on taxation
What did Godwin do?
Gilmore and Sullivan
Warner's judges
Eastern stars
The wreck of old No. 39
It'll be Goode in the Fifth
The Wilder gamble
The politics of water
On Labor Day, coal miners and being a Republican
Shadow responsibilities
A time for all Virginians to pull together
The people versus the powerful in Northern Virginia
A media double standard?
Warner's California Ways
Bill Howell: the Un-Wesson
Goodlatte for Congress -- forever
Trust, political and otherwise