 |
|
Preston Bryant is a Republican who has represented Lynchburg and part of Amherst County in the Virginia House of Delgates since 1996.
|
PITTSBURGH --State and local governments go head-to-head, no matter where you are. It’s true in Virginia, and it’s true in Pennsylvania. Elsewhere, for sure.
Virginia has seen the relationship between Richmond and her cities, towns, and counties deteriorate for decades, but it’s an estrangement that’s accelerated over the past handful of years. At the root of it all is money.
The state treasury takes in a lot of money that in turn is supposed to be sent to local governments to support such basic services as schools, public safety, and transportation. Trouble is, the state isn’t holding up its entire end of the bargain, choosing instead to abdicate some of its funding responsibilities. Local governments have to make up for the state’s shortcomings, usually resulting in higher real estate taxes and cuts in services.
Here in Pennsylvania, in one of the state’s gem cities, a drama is unfolding that could be a case study of what happens when state and local officials fail to cooperate.
The three major rivers that cut through western Pennsylvania’s Alleghenies -- the Monongahela and Allegheny meet to create the Ohio -- do so at what is today Pittsburgh. It’s a picturesque spot that offered the perfect place for water-dependent industrialists to set up shop, and in the 19th century the city came into its own as a bustling coal, steel and financial center, helped along by the Mellons, Carnegies, Fricks, and Phippses. The Heinzes were in there, too, also leaving an indelible mark on the city.
This is a city that over the past decade or so has swept up its coal and steel dust, spit-polished its downtown, and invested in its infrastructure and cultural institutions to give it a less industrial face and a more cosmopolitan one. Barges can still be seen pushing loads of coal and other raw materials up and down the rivers, whose banks were once home to more factories than today, and just a few blocks away there’s Marvin Hamlisch conducting the Pittsburgh Symphony Pops.
If Pittsburgh can reinvent itself, most any city can. Of course, it always helps to have among your citizenry the hugely philanthropic legacies of a handful of America’s leading industrialists, manufacturers and financiers.
That said, however, Pittsburgh is in need of its greatest transformation yet. The city’s got an $80 million budget deficit for 2004 and is scheduled to run out of money -- literally -- in about 90 days. In 2005, the city is projected to have an $85 million deficit. The cause in a word, according to folks who live here, is mismanagement. The Democratic mayor, Tom Murphy, is now proposing to sell off city-owned assets, such as swimming pools, recreational centers and asphalt plants. He also wants to cut more jobs and merge some services with Allegheny County, the latter being a common-sense suggestion that shortsighted municipal-employee unions are fighting.
And as we’re in the final week or so leading up to local city and county elections, well, you can imagine how charged the political ions are right about now.
But let’s get back to lessons to be learned here.
A local Republican state senator, Jane Orie, pushed to form a blue-ribbon panel of top business leaders to assess Pittsburgh’s finances, look for efficiencies, and make recommendations. The group was led by David Roderick, the former chairman of U.S. Steel Corp., and Elsie Hillman, a leading philanthropist and former Republican National Committeewoman. Roderick and Hillman pulled together 30 top business execs to do the work. The group’s report is complete, and it calls for the creation of a financial review board as well as a combination of new taxes and spending cuts. (Any new taxes wouldn’t kick in until some $45 million in cuts had been achieved.) Orie and other suburban state legislators are rejecting that plan, preferring spending cuts alone, though they, too, want the oversight board. The two Republicans, Orie and Hillman, are now publicly at odds.
It has also been mentioned that some form of -- get this -- tax reform be enacted. Sound familiar? The notion is that the state-local tax structure might be a tad out of whack, contributing to the city’s extreme financial woes.
There’s a standoff between the state and local government leaders, which is fueled locally by the same distrust that suburban voters the world over have for cities. In the meantime, Pittsburgh is drowning.
We’re fortunate in Virginia. As challenging as it might be to assemble a state or local budget in these tight economic times, there’s no Pittsburgh-like story to be found in the Old Dominion. None even close.
But what a value it would be for a few of Virginia’s elected state and local leaders to visit this three-river city and witness their on-going spectacle. They should see the gauntlets that litter Pittsburgh and Allegheny County, all thrown in soap-opera huffs, and all thrown for naught.
Virginia’s elected state leaders in both the executive and legislative branches need to get serious about tax reform. There must be a meeting of the minds on how to better fashion the revenue-sharing relationship between the state and local governments.
And local governments -- especially those major counties and cities that make up Virginia’s most concentrated population centers -- must continue doing their part by collaboratively divvying up resources and sharing service responsibilities to the extent laws allow.
Pittsburgh is in trouble, and state and local leaders are fiddling around in a way that’d make Nero blush. Meanwhile, Hamlisch and his Pops are over at the corner of Penn Avenue and Sixth Street performing in the elegant Heinz Hall.
Among Hamlisch’s numbers: "The Way We Were."
Let any elected or appointed official know what you think and how you feel by clicking here.
Post a message to Preston Bryant's message board
The Bryant Archive
Canadian Conservatives, broccoli, and Virginia Republicans
Arnold's 'Virginia Plan'
An Alaskan's influence on I-81
Rollison to VDOT
Hannity & Newman
Newer deal on Medicaid
Moody's blues
Warner's union bug
Griffin will turn state GOP right side up
Texas and Virginia
Colorado and Virginia
Ever our strength is our bond (rating)
Cutting telecom taxes -- the right way
GOP's philosophy of no
Virginia Democrats: Odd couplings with presidential contenders
Oh, (Big) Brother
Money, politics and higher education
McQuigg's roadmap
GOP primaries and tax reform
Cleaning up Capitol Square
Utopian Democrats
Looking beyond the higher ed summit
Virginia FREE's stubbed toe
Ireland and Virginia
Primary chances
ODU steps up to the plate
Days late and dollars short
The good and bad of higher ed rankings
Tax reform, Act IV
Jerry Kilgore: a man for our times
Carter and Scott: a dastardly duo
Warner's election year gamble
A rolling stop at VDOT?
Too small a step for higher ed
Budget onion II
The Conservative House
Republicans remake Warner budget
Judging judges
MLK at 74
Budget onion
Call to post
New Year with no new taxes
Republican General Assembly should support black heritage, MLK programs
Trent Lott must resign as majority leader
Public health: our bounden duty
Towards a free market in higher education
Tax reform is overdue
Hear them roar
Referendum on taxation
What did Godwin do?
Gilmore and Sullivan
Warner's judges
Eastern stars
The wreck of old No. 39
It'll be Goode in the Fifth
The Wilder gamble
The politics of water
On Labor Day, coal miners and being a Republican
Shadow responsibilities
A time for all Virginians to pull together
The people versus the powerful in Northern Virginia
A media double standard?
Warner's California Ways
Bill Howell: the Un-Wesson
Goodlatte for Congress -- forever
Trust, political and otherwise